PET SHAMPOO INGREDIENT LISTS
PART
I – THE CURRENT SITUATION
As more pet
groomers have been requesting ingredient information, some companies have been
responding and will provide ingredient lists. Others, especially companies that retail to the public, want
their product labels to resemble human products and include ingredient
information on the label. Not all
these ingredient declarations are equal, however, and not all are complete and
informative. There are some of manufacturers that stubbornly refuse to share
ingredient information, and claim “trade secrecy.”
Why are pet
shampoo manufacturers so resistant to disclosing ingredient information?
- Because they don’t HAVE to disclose. There is no legal mandate requiring manufacturers to disclose ingredients. Some cosmetic manufacturers (human or animal) would much rather market by hype and claims than by actual ingredients.
- Because pet shampoo formulas are more similar than different. Pet shampoo companies make a big fuss over the importance of “trade secrecy” to their ingredient lineups, as if they contain unique and special ingredients. The truth is pet shampoos are more similar than different from company to company. While the designer additives may differ, the working part of the shampoo, the shampoo base, is often similar. This is not necessarily a Bad Thing. Simple and similar ingredient line-ups can be very effective in cleaning dirty dogs. The different additives give the products their personality and image.
- Because they don’t want pet groomers to become “ingredient police.” This is a reason with which I empathize. There is way too much Internet propaganda and fear mongering designed to frighten people away from traditional ingredients. Unsophisticated and unaware consumers buy into negative propaganda about “dangerous ingredients” and want to cherry-pick ingredients. An example of a maligned ingredient is Propylene Glycol. This moisturizing ingredient has been used effectively for decades, has been extensively studied and determined as safe, but manufacturers of alternative, more “natural” products, want to scare us away from by calling it “anti-freeze”, and worse. Pet shampoo manufacturers do not want to have to defend every ingredient choice.
- Because they want to be able to change or modify formulas without costly label printing, and without consumers knowing that they have changed the formula(s). This is understandable, although not defendable. Consumers should know of changes in ingredient lineups, regardless of the cost of label printing.
What can we expect to find
on a pet shampoo ingredient list?
Not only is there no legal
mandate that requires pet shampoo manufacturers to disclose ingredients, there
is no uniform format for listing ingredients when they are declared. One
manufacturer’s ingredient list may use formal chemical names for all or most
items, and another may use common names or chemical supplier’s jargon. While some companies are forthright and
use the rules established for human cosmetics, others dance around the issue of
disclosure, by using descriptive terms, hiding ingredients under the mantle of
“shampoo base”, or simply listing only the additives or “selling point”
ingredients.
What is required on a list
for human cosmetics?
It is helpful to look at the requirements for human cosmetics, as it
gives us a model by which we can gauge the informational value of the pet
product lists we obtain. Also, a
look at human cosmetics labeling gives insight into the assumptions and
expectations we have when we look at a list of declared ingredients for a pet
product.
Authority over cosmetics labeling was assigned to the FDA by the
Federal Food Drug & Cosmetic Act of 1938. The act has been amended to add regulations over the
years. The current cosmetic
ingredient labeling regulations were established in 1977. They require
ingredients to be fully declared, in descending order of predominance, by the
nomenclature established in reference sources of ingredient names. The primary reference used today is the
International Cosmetic Ingredient
Dictionary and Handbook. This reference lists ingredients by the INCI
names, International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients. 1
1 1. Fully Disclosed – Each and every ingredient
must be identified. The notable
exception is trade secret
ingredients. Companies must submit
an application to have trade secret status, and then must list “other
ingredients” at the end of the ingredient list. Another way to identify these proprietary ingredients is to
use an assumed company name that does not allow its identification through any
of the listed sources. In pet
products, an example of this type of listing is EZ Groom Crystal White Shampoo
that lists, “Enzywhite-SRW Complex”.
A trade secret is defined by the Freedom of Information Act as “any formula, pattern, device or compilation of information used in one’s business and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.” Under this definition, EZ Groom’s enzymatic complex would likely pass as proprietary, but common surfactants found in shampoo bases would not.
Currently, fragrance ingredients are the only ingredients in labeling of human products that can be identified simply by function, “fragrance” or “parfum. In pet product labeling, it is common to find ingredients identified by description of their function rather than chemical names. I call this the “descriptive dodge.” An example would be, “coconut cleansing agent”.
2 2. Descending order of predominance – This rule applies
to all ingredients present in concentrations of more than 1% in the finished
product. Ingredients present in 1%
or less amounts may be listed in any order after those at higher
concentrations. Also, color additives may be listed in any order after the
listing of all other ingredients.
Under this rule, most shampoo ingredient lists would begin with “water”
and end with one or two color additives, or identification of the
preservatives.
Many pet shampoo ingredient lists break this
rule, mixing up the order so that the selling point ingredients appear at the
top of the list. For example, an
Oatmeal Shampoo might list Oatmeal as the first ingredient. Really? If there is more oatmeal in the bottle than water, it would
not pour. If there is more Aloe
Vera juice than cleansing surfactants would the shampoo clean?
3. INCI names. Few people other than chemists really like the
technical INCI names for cosmetic ingredients. However, this nomenclature serves a very important purpose:
use of INCI names reduces inconsistencies and confusion in how ingredients are
identified. When an ingredient is
identified under a scientific name
(Lauramide Diethanolamide) on one list, a trade name on another
(Lauramide D), and by function on a third list (foam stabilizer), the consumer has
no way of knowing that these are all the same item. INCI names level the playing field. On human products,
botanical ingredients are required to be listed by their latin names, although
common names can be used in parenthesis.
Lavender essential oil would be listed only as Lavendula officinalis (Lavender) oil. This is rarely found on pet products.
4. No qualifying or descriptive information – On human
cosmetics ingredient lists, they are not supposed to put modifying or
qualifying information that makes other brands look bad in comparison, such as,
organic, purified, or from coconut. The use of modifiers is common in pet product ingredient
information. Gentle, mild, earth-friendly, are all used for marketing
appeal.
Since no requirements exist for the labeling
on pet products, there is no reason not to use the human cosmetics labeling
requirements. Why should we hold
pet products to a lesser standard?
We shouldn’t of course. Ingredient lists are important not only in
comparing one product to another, but also in assessing how well the product
ingredients measure up to the product marketing claims. In Part 2 of this series, we will look
at some pet product ingredient lists and assess them against the requirements
for human labeling. Stay tuned. “Technical” can be fun!

No comments:
Post a Comment